?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Doctor Who: Season 26

Regular readers will be aware that I have been feasting my eyes on much of the early Doctor Who which was broadcast before I was born, or old enough to really take it in, and very much enjoying it. In the spirit of experiment, therefore, I have also started watching the classic Who stories broadcast after I had stopped watching - spurred to do this partly because of fannish muttering about how the final season was really much better than what had gone before, and such a shame the Beeb decided to cancel the series then.

The four stories of Season 26 were broadcast in late 1989, as the Berlin Wall fell and revolution swept Eastern Europe. Times were changing, and Doctor Who feels now like part of the old regime struggling to adapt to new demands for a new era. The programme's makers made a better fist of it than any of the Communist leaderships of Eastern Europe, but it was not enough.

Battlefield (.co.uk, .com) must have been the killer blow which led to the cancellation. It is simply awful. The story is incomprehensible, the direction (particularly of the all-important action scenes) both uninspiring and incoherent, the supposed killer-end-of-the-universe monster is atrocious, and the background music some of the worst of all time. I haven't seen much late-eighties Doctor Who, but I shall be very surprised if I find another story as bad as this. I am among that minority (even among the small number who have watched it) who thought Ben Aaronovitch's other story, Remembrance of the Daleks, was bad too, so it comes as little surprise to me.

Surely the programme's makers must have realised what a risk they were taking with an uneven writer for the opening story of a season where the entire programme faced cancellation? Ye who complain about Torchwood, or about how not quite every story of new Who comes up to the standards you have come to expect of Buffy or Battlestar Galactica, some time please sit down and watch Battlefield, and marvel.

Anyway, I should not be wholly negative. Nicholas Courtney puts in one of his best performances as the Brigadier, and has a great confrontation scene with Jean Marsh playing the chief villain. (The two of them had appeared together in Doctor Who 23 years earlier, playing brother and sister galactic agents in The Daleks' Master Plan.) But that's about it; even McCoy and Aldred seem to have little idea of what is going on.

Ghost Light (.co.uk, .com) is an entirely different matter. I approached it with some suspicion, in that I had found several of Marc Platt's other offerings (Downtime, Auld Mortality, Lungbarrow) tough going. And indeed, Ghost Light is tough going too, but I very much felt it was worth the effort: intricately constructed, well acted, beautifully shot; certainly the best story I've seen that was broadcast between Caves of Androzani and Rose.

One of my big complaints of Who of this era is that so little efffort seems to have been put into getting the settings right: Ghost Light does not suffer from this problem - from the beginning, and indeed all the way through, you feel convinced that this is a Victorian mansion, even when it turns out that the butler is a living Neanderthal and there is a spaceship in the basement.

Also the Doctor's bringing Ace back to the scene of her childhood crimes is, if I'm not mistaken, practically the first attempt ever to link a companion to his or her back story. More on this later.

It is, however, a story very far removed from the normal territory of Doctor Who - surrealist play meets Agatha Christie, perhaps - and despite the quality of the drama it must have further created doubt about what Doctor Who was actually for. Still, apparently this was the last story of the old series actually filmed (although the third last to be broadcast) and it's nice to feel that that the cast and team must have felt they were going out on a high.

The Curse of Fenric (.co.uk, .com) had been strongly recommended to me by wwhyte, and I adopted his suggestion that I watch the extended director's cut version on the DVD rather than the show as originally broadcast (in keeping with the non-sequential traditions of the show, this was actually the last story of the four that I watched, during a three-hour stopover in Ankara airport last Friday).

Well, it is indeed a good story - most memorably, Nicholas Parsons, of all people, playing it straight as the doomed vicar Mr Wainwright; a setting in the second world war that actually looks a bit like it might be the 1940s; vampire villains which now seem an errie foreshadowing of Buffy; secret codes and ancient evils, and the crucial importance of faith. Indeed, of the four last stories, it is the one which most resembles classic Who at its best.

I was not utterly convinced by the plot; I never like stories which crucially depend on some unbroadcast and untold past adventure of the Doctor's. And although I did like Tomek Bork's portrayal of Sorin, I was not totally convinced by the behaviour of the Russian soldiers (and to a lesser extent of the British) - as soldiers, that is. However, in general, this was a good 'un.

Survival (.co.uk, .com), I'm afraid, did not make such a good impression on me. The scenes in Perivale seemed to me oddly flat, including the very peculiar performances of Hale and Pace as a pair of sinister shopkeepers and the young Adele Silva, later to achieve soap stardom in Emmerdale, making a rather unconvincing appearance in the final episode. No doubt diehard fans see this as adding to the mysterious atmosphere but I just thought it was rather crap.

The peculiar choice of using videotape for everything didn't help either, and made the scenes on the planet of the Cheetahs look naff rather than alien. The evil cats, well, let's not go there. The story, once again, made very little sense; the links between the Cheetah planet and its inhabitants, and why they have picked Perivale as the one place they can teleport to, never properly explained. I thought Anthony Ainley made the best of a bad job with his performance, but was not really convinced by much else. OK, it is not as crashingly bad as Battlefield, but it is not really very good either.

The final words of the classic Who era are oddly out of place for the story, but fit the spirit of the previous 26 years rather well, I think:
"There are worlds out there where the sky is burning, and the sea's asleep, and the rivers dream. People made of smoke, and cities made of song. Somewhere there's danger, somewhere there’s injustice, and somewhere else the tea's getting cold! Come on, Ace — we’ve got work to do!"


A final thought about this final season: the last three stories all revolved to a certain extent around Ace's character and past - Ghost Light bringing her to the house she burned down, The Curse of Fenric confronting her with her infant mother, and Survival, of course, bringing her back to Perivale. I haven't seen any of the earlier Ace stories (apart from Resurrection of the Daleks), so I don't know if Season 26 was a first step in this regard.

It was a brave step - I think this was the first time that the unfolding plot had had such an encounter with the past of one of the companions. The UNIT team, of course, were based firmly in their own time and did not need to be removed from it. Both the contemporary and Silver Jubilee parts of Mawdryn Undead were within the narrative flow of the Brigadier's continuity, ie after Terror of the Zygons. The Doctor himself, of course, had often been confronted with uncomfortable facts from his past, starting with The Time Meddler; but that is a different matter.

Part of the success of New Who has been that it revolved so much around Rose's family and friends on contemporary Earth, and Season 26 may, I think, have been trying to move Ace in that direction. I don't think it worked, for a couple of reasons. Partly this is because it was indeed a departure from the classic Who format, of companions arriving, doing their stuff, and moving on changed by that experience as by nothing else in their lives; and the immensity of the attempted change of treatment of Ace, as compared with her predecessors, would have meant a much more significant restructuring of the way Who conceived of its plots than was possible with the resources (and personnel) available.

Also, it was an attempt to inject back-story into a character who had not been sketched strongly enough to sustain it, and to be honest, I'm not sure Sophie Aldred was up to it; while not my least favourite companion, she doesn't have many great moments (though there are a couple in both Ghost Light and The Curse of Fenric).

Anyway, I guess I shall subject myself to Season 25 next. Though before I do that, I have some more Hartnells, and some other bits and bobs, to write up.

Comments

( 9 comments — Leave a comment )
peteyoung
Jan. 28th, 2007 06:15 pm (UTC)
Re. 'Ghost Light', I think it took an enormous amount of trust from the actors that the end result was going to make any kind of cohesive sense – I had to watch the whole thing twice before I completely understood what was going on. I suspect it must have been very confusing to film, but the end result is a very unique story dressed up as costume drama.
watervole
Jan. 28th, 2007 06:41 pm (UTC)
"There are worlds out there where the sky is burning, and the sea's asleep, and the rivers dream. People made of smoke, and cities made of song. Somewhere there's danger, somewhere there’s injustice, and somewhere else the tea's getting cold! Come on, Ace — we’ve got work to do!"

What a beautiful quote!
missfairchild
Jan. 28th, 2007 07:02 pm (UTC)
I do agree with a lot of what you've said here. As someone who was a fan of the 7th Doctor while the series was limping towards its undignified end, I got into no end of arguments about season 26. I thought then - and believe even more strongly now - that its strong points outweight the stinkers.

It's very good to see it being re-evaluated in a (mostly) positive way here.
blue_condition
Jan. 28th, 2007 07:41 pm (UTC)
I certainly agree with you that Battlefield was, not to put too fine a point on it, an absolute train-crash of a story. Too much continuity that only fans would understand, a story that was 'worth' about 25 minutes, and curiously flat performances from everyone other than Courtney. It also looked cheap and small-scale.

I think Ghost Light/Fenric were a superb "Story of Ace" arc, really hinting at the oddities in her background (she would've been much more convincing with all the "Bad Wolf" stuff than Rose, wouldn't she?). However they chucked it all away with Survival which I think is possibly the worst thing ever to have appeared under the Who imprimatur.

Survival was illogical, cheap, tacky, looked embarrassingly bad, and bore about as much relationship to science fiction as gravel does to cheddar. It played out like one of those schools dramas - The Boy From Space on Look & Read, or the dire Aliens In The Family. In a sense, it had to be the last 'classic' Who broadcast, because it was a clear statement that the show as it stood was creatively bankrupt and lacked any real support.

If season 27/7th Doc had followed in the dark, surreal, dense, adult tradition of Fenric/Ghost Light/Greatest Show In The Galaxy Doctor Who might conceivably have never gone away. OK, it might've needed a format change to a later-evening slot with longer episodes, and, hey, it might've benefited from the odd PJ Hammond episode... but it would've still been Doctor Who.

But when it was dropping clangers like Delta and the Bannermen, Battlefield, and Survival it had to go. It's appropriate that classic Who went out on a dying fall because by that point there was nothing left.
nwhyte
Jan. 28th, 2007 07:57 pm (UTC)
...Survival which I think is possibly the worst thing ever to have appeared under the Who imprimatur

Hmm, actually worse than Battlefield? Or The Twin Dilemma? Or The Dominators, a really terrible story of the Troughton era? Don't get me wrong, I think it is pretty bad, but to dignifiy it as the absolute worst gives it more credit than it deserves!
blue_condition
Jan. 28th, 2007 08:26 pm (UTC)
Battlefield at least had Cybermen. They weren't very good cybermen, but it had some tolerable bits to it.

The Twin Dilemma I actually liked. Well. OK. Disliked *less* than the rest of Colin Baker's stories. It was stupid, camp and had rubbish monsters, but by 'eck it was less lame than some of what came after.

I must admit to not knowing much of The Dominators, I know Season 6 had its problems though!
nwhyte
Jan. 29th, 2007 05:21 am (UTC)
Battlefield at least had Cybermen

I think you mean Silver Nemesis, which I haven't seen!
blue_condition
Jan. 29th, 2007 09:52 am (UTC)
I did! - someone else got confused further up-thread as well ;P
wwhyte
Jan. 29th, 2007 11:37 pm (UTC)
There are a lot of things wrong with Survival:

CHARACTER 1: Survival is the theme of the story.
CHARACTER 2: I'm sorry, that wasn't heavy-handed enough. (EATS HIM).
CHARACTER 3: That was definitely an example of *survival* of the *fittest*. (EATS CHARACTER 2).
CHARACTER 2 (INSIDE CHARACTER 2): Yes. Except that the *fittest* (PAUSE) *survived*. Like animals.

On the other hand, there are a lot of good things. In a season that's about everything falling apart and the Doctor simultaneously being much more powerful and mysterious than we thought, but at the same time not as in control as he thinks he is, the end of Episode 2 is absolutely we're-fucked-now perfect.
( 9 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

March 2019
S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by yoksel