Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

September Books 7) The Terminal Experiment

7) The Terminal Experiment, by Robert J. Sawyer

This is not quite as bad a book as I had been led to believe. The prose is often leaden - in particular, the cringe-worthy opening passage which I think should be used as a model of how not to write in classes for impressionable young writers, and the numerous info-dumps idicating that the characters have read all the available scientific literature up to 1994 (which is a shame as most of the book is set in 2011). What appears to be the killer idea of the first half of the book - that science can detect the soul leaving the body at death - is simply forgotten for the last third of the narrative, which plays the rogue-AI's in the net cliche as a murder mystery, leading to an unconvincing resolution. The detective character herself violates standard operating procedure by burbling her theories about the crime to one of the key suspects.

But apart from that, the characters were not too unbelievable and the exploration of the issues of artificial intelligence and the scientific basis of the soul not too undergraduate (with all due respect to my undergraduate readers). And he does predict a future Pope Benedict XVI. (Of course, whether the present Pope will still be there in 2011 is another matter.)

Still, it is pretty surprising that this won the 1995 Nebula Award for Best Novel. I confess I haven't read any of the other nominees, and if this was voted better than them I don't really intend to. (Actually, I may have read Beggars and Choosers by Nancy Kress - I know I read one of the later books in the series, and was seriously unimpressed.) The Hugo for the equivalent year went to Bujold's Mirror Dance, which is the start of the superb four-book climax to the Vorkosigan saga (as continued in Memory, Komarr, and A Civil Campaign).

This is not the worst Nebula-winning novel I have read - that title goes to either The Quantum Rose by Catherine Asaro or The Gods Themselves by Isaac Asimov - but it is certainly in the bottom four. I can't decide if I like it less than Neuromancer, because I can't remember anything about the Gibson book, even though I know I have read it several times.

OK, only Rite of Passage by Alexei Panshin to go...


( 5 comments — Leave a comment )
Sep. 12th, 2006 05:50 am (UTC)
If there is one book I regret I've ever read, it's this one. It boosted my already big death phobia so much I had a couple months of overwhelming anxiety, and I suspect some effects still linger on, despite of years passed after I read it. :-\
Sep. 12th, 2006 08:55 am (UTC)
> OK, only Rite of Passage by Alexei Panshin to go...

Ooooh, you're saving up some real punishment for yourself. A late-sixties take on the Heinlein juvenile, but it reads like it's been translated badly from some strange foreign language. It feels (at least to me) like it was written in the forties and then "updated" to make the cardboard-cutout culture in it more "modern".

Must've been a seriously duff year!
Sep. 12th, 2006 09:54 am (UTC)
The only thing I remember about Neuromancer is that it starts with a teenager having a tug in clean sheets. Or was that Mona Lisa Overdrive? Nah, can't remember.
Sep. 12th, 2006 11:01 am (UTC)
It wasn't Neuromancer, and I don't think it was MLO because MLO was the one that started with $generic_proponent getting blown up.

I still couldn't tell you how the plot strands in MLO fitted together and I've read it several times.
Sep. 12th, 2006 11:02 am (UTC)
Actually you may be right. What I'm thinking of as MLO was Count Zero. ;P

( 5 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

October 2019


Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by yoksel