?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Second paragraph of third chapter:
Pound began attending Yeats's Monday dinner gatherings in London. He dashed about with his wild mane of hair, flung himself into fragile chairs, and leaned back in luxuriant repose. His black velvet jacket and facial hair — a long mustache and a tuft on his chin trimmed to a point — were part of his poetic regalia. His flowing capes, open-necked shirts and billiard-green felt trousers rankled London's staid sensibilities. At one of Yeats's gatherings, Pound began plucking the petals off the red tulips on the table and, one by one, he ate them. When the conversation paused, Pound asked, "Would anyone mind having the roof taken off the house?" At which point he stood up and began reading one of his poems in his unabashed American accent.
I picked this up for a pound or two in a remainder shop, but it was well worth it. I am vaguely familiar with Joyce and Ulysses; I must say I had not appreciated just how strong the censorship regimes were in both the UK and the USA at the turn of the century, and the extent to which literary innovation was tied into political radicalism - The Little Review, which initially serialised Ulysses in America, was closely linked to Emma Goldman and generally sympathetic to anarchism. I also hadn't realised the crucial role of Ulysses in the origins of Random House. It's a fascinating story, well told.

Joyce himself comes across as a demanding, self-centred individual, constantly needing financial subvention from (mostly female) donors, his body riddled by venereal disease, driving his family mad. But there's something about his prose that catches your soul, and while there are parts of Ulysses that miss the mark, there are parts that very much hit it. Birmingham makes the very strong case that censorship was wrong and unjustifiable in principle, but the fact that it was being used against a work as hefty (in many ways) as Ulysses made the case for continued censorship weaker (though not in Ireland, where Ulysses was never formally tested but there was a tough regime for censorship of books from 1929 to 1967,, parts lasting until 1998).

This was the top unread book recommended by you last year. (As previously mentioned, I don't think I will be soliciting recommendations in the same way this year.) Next on that list, if I get there, is Script Doctor by Andrew Cartmel.

Comments

( 3 comments — Leave a comment )
redfiona99
Dec. 14th, 2017 11:44 pm (UTC)
>>but the fact that it was being used against a work as hefty (in many ways) as Ulysses made the case for continued censorship weaker << I've always wondered if that sort of thing was the censors over-playing their hand or that we only hear about the storms about the "big" works e.g. Lady Chatterley's Lover.
oedipamaas49
Dec. 15th, 2017 10:16 am (UTC)
If you read the verdict declaring Ulysses not obscene, it's hard not to be impressed by the humanity and eloquence of the judge.
johnny9fingers
Dec. 15th, 2017 12:22 pm (UTC)
Shakespeare and Co. 1922. Edition of 600, with another 400 following as part of the print run of the first. Various papers used on the early pressings. When seen, often without covers, which were torn off to get the book through customs. (A chum owned one brought back by his Grandmamma when she was a flighty young thing in Paris, minus binding: the book, not the Grandmamma, obvs. It gave him a deposit on a house, which he would not otherwise have had.)

When my ship comes in....
( 3 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

January 2018
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by yoksel