?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

The 4-Hour Workweek, by Timothy Ferriss

Second paragraph of third chapter:
He held his breath on the final step, and the panic drove him to near unconsciousness. His vision blurred at the edges, closing to a single pinpoint of light, and then … he floated. The all-consuming celestial blue of the horizon hit his visual field an instant after he realized that the thermal updraft had caught him and the wings of the paraglider. Fear was behind him on the mountaintop, and thousands of feet above the resplendent green rain forest and pristine white beaches of Copacabana, Hans Keeling had seen the light.
Ferriss believes that he has found the answer to happiness in life. It is to outsource all the stuff you hate doing in your working day to long-distance personal assistants in developing countries, and then do only the stuff you like for as long as you want to. He reckons that he can have a princely lifestyle with only four hours of actual paid work per week, and that you can too if you follow his advice.

This is one of those evangelical self-help books which is written by a very confident person with very little self-awareness. He admits towards the end that he has resigned from three jobs in his career and been fired from all the rest. This comes as little surprise to the reader; I think it's clear that Ferriss and office culture are a poor match, and both sides are winners now that he is no longer there.

Perhaps I'm weird, but I actually like my office and my workmates. I enjoy going to a physical location where you can drop by someone else's desk (and other colleagues drop by mine) to discuss the latest ideas for transforming our collective brainpower into a paid product. My life would actually be poorer in quality if I didn't have an interesting place to go and earn money every day separate from where I live. It's not to everyone's taste, of course, but I think Ferriss doesn't quite see that his priorities are not universally shared.

Having said that, he has some very good ideas about productivity and personal branding which are relevant no matter what your working circumstances. I nodded with approval at his evangelical endorsement of Evernote, which admitedly I use more for leisure activities than work but which is a really powerful tool. His tips for cheap travel (including travel with children) are also of general relevance.

Still, I fear the packaging is just a bit annoying. I think I will recommend extracted chapters to colleagues, but counsel caution with regard to the whole thing.

This was both the most popular non-fiction book on my unread shelf, and the most popular unread book that I acquired last year. Next on both lists is The Cuckoo's Egg, by Cliff Stoll.

Comments

( 8 comments — Leave a comment )
justphoenix
Jul. 13th, 2016 05:11 pm (UTC)
I can see that as an office worker. gets stir crazy if he doesn't go leave the apartment at least once every other day. OTOH, he can take a nap in bed in the middle of the day-which is a nice thing to have when you're a new parent!
inner_storm
Jul. 13th, 2016 05:48 pm (UTC)
I actually found in my last job it was a lot more difficult to fit in, to know what was going on (really going on), etc because I only had to be there once a week. Although there are certainly advantages when you can work from home, working in an office certainly has advantages as well.
kalimac
Jul. 13th, 2016 06:22 pm (UTC)
A business school grad student once offered me, with enthusiasm, an article about an (unidentified) senior manager whose division was the most successful at the company, despite the fact that he was rarely in the office and spent most of his time playing golf. (That's great, if you like golf.)

His secret was never explicitly specified, but it appeared to be that he simply told his chief subordinates to figure everything out for themselves instead of taking orders from him. That left unanswered the question of, why was he needed at all?
mountainkiss
Jul. 14th, 2016 07:58 am (UTC)
Because if they fired him, he'd be replaced by someone who didn't delegate decision-making to people who knew the score, and hence business success would reduce?
kalimac
Jul. 14th, 2016 01:53 pm (UTC)
No, leave it empty.

In fact, if the article's lessons on how to be a good executive were applied - and that was the intent of the article - you wouldn't need any executives at all.
mountainkiss
Jul. 14th, 2016 03:24 pm (UTC)
You see, I'm not sure I think this is realistic in an organisation. People have to report to someone else, so all his current direct reports would end up reporting to a new person, who would be likely to be more interventionist than he. There might be a rare organisation whose culture would allow them to operate in a vacuum, but I think they are few and far between.
kalimac
Jul. 14th, 2016 03:40 pm (UTC)
Well, that's my point. I don't believe the article at all, not one whit of it, because if it were true it would lead to this self-evidently ridiculous conclusion.
kalimac
Jul. 13th, 2016 06:27 pm (UTC)
In my job, I couldn't possibly have done what he advised. My work employed my subject expertise, which some P.A. in India isn't going to have. Furthermore, it involved consulting physical objects, and how would I get those to India? What's more, if my bosses had discovered me sloughing off my work and goofing off like that, they'd have fired my ass, which is apparently what happened to Ferriss.
( 8 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

March 2019
S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by yoksel