Nicholas (nwhyte) wrote,
Nicholas
nwhyte

On the new Hugo voters

After Sasquan's spectacular intake of new Supporting Memberships following the announcement of the Hugo shortlists, I've seen a great deal of speculation on what this might mean in terms of votes. I think we can all be certain that most of these new members have joined with the intention of participating in the Hugos; how will they do so?

I thought one easy measure might be geography. Sasquan has published the geographical breakdown of its members as of 30 April; I have compared these with Loncon's membership as of 31 July last year, the day when Hugo voting closed, looking only at the 50 US states and the District of Columbia. My intention was to see if I could detect a clear shift in Sasquan's membership, as compared to Loncon's, from "red" states to "blue" or vice versa. My reasoning is that if there has been a surge of membership from states where voters are generally right-wing, that might indicate a more right-wing electorate.

I have to say that this proved impossible to detect. I give the figures below, but there are only 11 of the 51 territories in question where Sasquan now has proportionally more members than Loncon did at close of Hugo votes. Those are:

Washington (20.1% of US-based Sasquan members, 5.9% of US-based Loncon members, up 14.2%)
Oregon (up 3.1%)
Idaho (up 1.1%)
Montana, Texas, Arizona, Iowa, Wyoming, Alaska, Missouri, Oklahoma (all up less than 0.5%).

Aside from the obvious geographical effect, these are such small changes as to be meaningless. Edited to add: On reflection, though I was looking for reaction to the ballot announcement and did not find it, I should also add here that the geographical effect favours two strongly blue (pro-Democrat) states, Washington and Oregon, and weakly favours a red (pro-Republican) state, Idaho.

At the other end, there are between 1.2% and 2.6% fewer US-based members at Sasquan compared to Loncon from Illinois, Massachusetts, New York, and California. These are all pretty blue (ie pro-Democrat) states, but perhaps more importantly they are all places with decent air connections to London. Illinois will also have been skewed upwards by Loncon's efforts to sign people up in the run-up to the convention site selection ballot in Chicago. (Edited to add: California was likely also boosted by the fact that both of Loncon's successive excellent US agents are from San Francisco.)

My conclusion is that the Hugo electorate this year is likely to be similar to the Hugo electorate of previous years; if anything more so.

Detailed figures below for anyone who wants to crunch them further.

State Sasquan Loncon Population %Sasquan %Loncon %USpop
Alabama 41 50 4,849,377 0.6% 1.2% 1.5%
Alaska 23 12 736,732 0.3% 0.3% 0.2%
Arizona 130 65 6,731,484 1.9% 1.6% 2.1%
Arkansas 22 20 2,966,369 0.3% 0.5% 0.9%
California 1092 693 38,802,500 15.9% 17.2% 12.2%
Colorado 161 105 5,355,866 2.3% 2.6% 1.7%
Connecticut 50 37 3,596,677 0.7% 0.9% 1.1%
Delaware 14 10 935,614 0.2% 0.2% 0.3%
District of Columbia 36 31 658,893 0.5% 0.8% 0.2%
Florida 145 107 19,893,297 2.1% 2.7% 6.2%
Georgia 83 58 10,097,343 1.2% 1.4% 3.2%
Hawaii 11 10 1,419,561 0.2% 0.2% 0.4%
Idaho 95 11 1,634,464 1.4% 0.3% 0.5%
Illinois 238 246 12,880,580 3.5% 6.1% 4.0%
Indiana 56 41 6,596,855 0.8% 1.0% 2.1%
Iowa 90 47 3,107,126 1.3% 1.2% 1.0%
Kansas 50 37 2,904,021 0.7% 0.9% 0.9%
Kentucky 36 24 4,413,457 0.5% 0.6% 1.4%
Louisiana 38 27 4,649,676 0.6% 0.7% 1.5%
Maine 22 18 1,330,089 0.3% 0.4% 0.4%
Maryland 215 152 5,976,407 3.1% 3.8% 1.9%
Massachusetts 302 282 6,745,408 4.4% 7.0% 2.1%
Michigan 114 78 9,909,877 1.7% 1.9% 3.1%
Minnesota 136 117 5,457,173 2.0% 2.9% 1.7%
Mississippi 4 7 2,994,079 0.1% 0.2% 0.9%
Missouri 88 51 6,063,589 1.3% 1.3% 1.9%
Montana 37 4 1,023,579 0.5% 0.1% 0.3%
Nebraska 22 24 1,881,503 0.3% 0.6% 0.6%
Nevada 34 30 2,839,099 0.5% 0.7% 0.9%
New Hampshire 41 43 1,326,813 0.6% 1.1% 0.4%
New Jersey 103 92 8,938,175 1.5% 2.3% 2.8%
New Mexico 39 33 2,085,572 0.6% 0.8% 0.7%
New York 251 235 19,746,227 3.6% 5.8% 6.2%
North Carolina 111 69 9,943,964 1.6% 1.7% 3.1%
North Dakota 4 5 739,482 0.1% 0.1% 0.2%
Ohio 113 102 11,594,163 1.6% 2.5% 3.6%
Oklahoma 39 23 3,878,051 0.6% 0.6% 1.2%
Oregon 335 73 3,970,239 4.9% 1.8% 1.2%
Pennsylvania 142 108 12,787,209 2.1% 2.7% 4.0%
Rhode Island 12 9 1,055,173 0.2% 0.2% 0.3%
South Carolina 29 23 4,832,482 0.4% 0.6% 1.5%
South Dakota 7 8 853,175 0.1% 0.2% 0.3%
Tennessee 52 45 6,549,352 0.8% 1.1% 2.1%
Texas 422 234 26,956,958 6.1% 5.8% 8.5%
Utah 92 67 2,942,902 1.3% 1.7% 0.9%
Vermont 11 7 626,562 0.2% 0.2% 0.2%
Virginia 207 142 8,326,289 3.0% 3.5% 2.6%
Washington 1384 239 7,061,530 20.1% 5.9% 2.2%
West Virginia 9 8 1,850,326 0.1% 0.2% 0.6%
Wisconsin 82 73 5,757,564 1.2% 1.8% 1.8%
Wyoming 11 1 584,153 0.2% 0.0% 0.2%


Incidentally, Florida is drastically underrepresented, in proportion to its population, on both lists.

Edited to add: Table has been revised as I got Loncon numbers for Maine and Connecticut wrong. The result is that they are not as divergent from Sasquan as I first reported, but California is a bit more so.

2015 Hugos: Initial observations | Voting No Award above the slates | How the slate was(n't) crowdsourced | Where the new voters are
Best Novel | Short fiction | Best Related Work | Best Graphic Story | Pro and Fan Artist | Best Dramatic Presentation (Short Form), Best Fan Writer, John W. Campbell Award
Tags: hugos 2015
Subscribe

  • My tweets

    Thu, 18:40: Doctor Who and the Silurians and Doctor Who and the Cave-Monsters, by Malcolm Hulke, and The Silurians, by Robert�Smith?…

  • My tweets

    Wed, 13:32: Andr�e Tainsy, 1911-2004 https://t.co/7vKdcRoeLS Wed, 15:32: RT @ Megintransition: Thinking about attending glasgow 2024*…

  • My tweets

    Tue, 18:14: Erasing Sherlock, by Kelly�Hale https://t.co/P1pyeHHYHZ Wed, 10:45: First up-close images of Mars’s little-known moon Deimos…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 6 comments