?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Voting for Tim Farron

I wrote a while back that I was likely to vote for Tim Farron in the election of the next President of the Lib Dems. Having perused the candidates' election leaflets, I see no reason to change my mind. Indeed, the two elections are so similar - straight out of the ALDC school of QuarkXPress - that it's rather easy to compare and contrast and to see that Tim basically has the harder edge. For example, take the "3 reasons to vote for me" given by each candidate:
Susan Kramer Tim Farron
1) Susan will work to keep our party strong, unified, distinctive and try to its core beliefs. 1) Tim is a campaigner with a track record of winning against the odds. He took a safe Tory seat and converted it into the highest Lib Dem vote share on the UK mainland.
2) Susan will listen to you, take your views and ideas to the party leadership and get answers. 2) Tim listens to the voice of grassroots members. He is best placed to make sure that the leadership and ministers listen to you.
3) Susan will travel up and down the country supporting your local Lib Dem campaigns. 3) Tim is an outstanding communicator with the media and public. He will get across the positive messages about the distinctiveness of the Liberal Democrats.
It is notable that all three of Susan Kramer's statements are in the future tense, while Tim Farron starts with the past, moves to the present and switches to the future only halfway through the third point. It's also notable that the future tense statements are all pretty woolly, and you would have to wonder why any candidate thought any of them was actually worth making as part of staking out your own ground. Note also that while the second of the three points is very similar for both candidates, Tim edges it by a) putting it in the present tense and b) pointing out that as an MP he has easier day-to-day access to the leadership.

That's all a matter of style, I suppose. On substance, Susan Kramer has more (though not a lot more) to say about using the position of President to service the party membership, and Tim Farron is crystal clear that he sees the role as another potential public platform for a senior Lib Dem to use. If I were more active in the party, perhaps I would have a sense of things going wrong that Susan Kramer could fix, but I'm not so I don't; and my ballot goes off with an X in the Farron box.

Tags:

Comments

( 4 comments — Leave a comment )
rmc28
Nov. 6th, 2010 06:52 pm (UTC)
I posted my ballot a few days ago, also with an X in the Farron box. Mum rang to encourage me to vote for him, but I'd already decided after watching the online hustings.
stevegreen
Nov. 7th, 2010 12:18 am (UTC)
I voted for Farron. Close call, though.
chess
Nov. 7th, 2010 01:10 pm (UTC)
This seems to be slightly unfair comparison, it looks fairly obvious to me that they are positioning themselves thus:

Tim Farron will use the position as a media springboard;

Susan Kramer will use the position as an excuse to get involved with everything at local-party kind of level.

Also, I can't help but be worried that Tim can't possibly do much more than he currently is, given he's already being an MP... it's more 'give him some additional visibility' than getting a whole extra person's worth of Lib Dem effort.
nwhyte
Nov. 7th, 2010 05:38 pm (UTC)
I think that's entirely fair of you, though based on greater knowledge of Susan Kramer than I possess!
( 4 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

May 2019
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by yoksel