?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

I'm not sure why I bought this particular guidebook to Doctor Who between 1963 and 2009, and I don't think I would recommend it to other readers. It tries to do several things - outlining the history of the show and plot synopses of the best remembered episodes, tying in to social and political events of the time, looking at literary and genre sources - but doesn't do any of them very thoroughly. Fans who have already dipped into reference books about the series will find little new here; I hope that those readers for whom this is their first book about the history of Who are stirred by it to go and buy better ones.

One area where it is peculiarly lacking is actual references. There is no chronological index, an omission explained by lack of space and the availability of the information online, but this leaves a sort of vague impression about the details of the show's history. Few calendar dates are given other than the year. Citations given in an appendix are incomplete - where, for instance, can we find the 2008 online debate with Ian Levine cited on pages 192-193? The back cover blurb promises "unique" interviews with Barry Letts and Philip Hinchcliffe, but this actually means extracts from pieces previously published in Dreamwatch, so not all that unique then.

I'm interested at least to see someone else pick up on the possible importance of the 1943 Tommy Handley vehicle Time Flies as inspiration for Who - I wrote about this two years ago, and Robb cites an article making the same point by Phil Norman and Chris Diamond in TV Cream's Anatomy of Cinema (which turns out on further research to be a book on forgotten films published in 2007).

However, I think even completists can skip this one fairly safely. (And I wish I could remember why I decided to buy it.)

Comments

( 3 comments — Leave a comment )
parrot_knight
Mar. 9th, 2010 09:25 pm (UTC)
I bought it late last year, read through it once, and found it insubstantial - the only new insight to me was the reference to Time Flies, and even then it only meant I'd not been paying enough attention to your LJ...
steve_mollmann
Mar. 10th, 2010 10:34 pm (UTC)
I'd seen enough about this one to give it a miss. I see from LT that you have The Triumph of a Time Lord; any plans to read it soon? I'm on the fence a bit.
nwhyte
Mar. 11th, 2010 12:19 pm (UTC)
I was saving it for my next long trip, but that is likely to be in the next month or so. My impression on leafing through it is fairly positive. I also have Chicks Dig Time Lords on order, and the expanded Writer's Tale in the pile, so may do all three together.
( 3 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

May 2019
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by yoksel