?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

I read the first edition of this two years ago, since when it has been sitting on the shelf with the other volumes of this superb series of handbooks to Doctor Who, looking a bit thin in comparison with its fellows. This second edition is massively expanded from the first, with most of the new material simply being more of the same excellent analysis of the programme's context (in this case the early 1970s) plus a lot more analytical essays and 147 endnotes (which is 142 more than in the first edition; though I repeat my complaint about them being endnotes rather than footnotes). There is loads more information about what was going on behind the scenes, most of which is very interesting; my own recent back problems make me very sympathetic to Jon Pertwee. A welcome shift in Wood's attitude has him attempting to incorporate New Who continuity into Old Who analysis, rather than the invective he was previously lapsing into; this offers him room for writing such essays as "All Right, Then... Where Were Torchwood?" and additional evidence for "When are the Unit Stories Set?" There are a couple of other standout pieces, "Why Did We Countdown to TV Action?" on the early 1970s Doctor Who comics, and "Why Didn't Plaid Cymru Lynch Barry Letts?" which ostensibly attempts to explain Wales to Americans but actually has a lot of good points to make.

When I read the first edition of this I hadn't yet seen all the Pertwee stories, and tended to go and look them up in Wood and Miles after I had finished watching them. Now I want to watch several of them again to see the things I missed first time around. An excellent handbook, and I am very glad that Wood is planning a seventh volume to cover the first years of New Who.

Comments

( 2 comments — Leave a comment )
parrot_knight
Jun. 29th, 2009 12:02 pm (UTC)
I'm in the process of going through mine and adding coloured flags where there are points with which I disagree and errors of fact or interpretations which I dispute because they are based on a misapprension of fact... this might seem petty, but it's an indicator of how much I'm enjoying it. I particularly like Wood's appreciation of Planet of the Spiders, an often unfairly maligned story. I still think we could do with a better apparatus, though - I don't think the series can claim to be 'ambitiously definitive' without them.
dm_1977
Jul. 9th, 2009 09:45 am (UTC)
the invective is still there... even as early as the new 'Things to Watch Out For' for Spearhead, he makes out the BBC Wales team using smashing glass as them 'gloating' over the classic series. (if Tat has read that first BBC Monsters book, and he almost certainly has being such a fact hoover, he'll know how much respect and love for the old team RTD has)

p.s. i found your LJ through a google search for 'tat wood' *lolz
( 2 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by yoksel