?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

K9 and Company

Long, long before Torchwood or the Sarah Jane Adventures, the BBC made a pilot for a possible spinoff series, K9 and Company, which lasted for precisely one 50-minute episode in December 1981. The novelisation, by Terence Dudley who also wrote the script, wasn't published until 1987, as the third the last in another series of spinoffs, Target's Companions of Doctor Who (the two earlier books being Turlough and the Earthlink Dilemma and Harry Sullivan's War). I picked it up the other day as a quick leisure read (more my thing than Elizabeth Spencer).

Dudley also wrote novelisations of his two other two-episode Who stories. Doctor Who - Black Orchid is possibly the best Fifth Doctor novelisation; Doctor Who - The King's Demons is one of the worst. Of the three stories as televised, Black Orchid was OK, K9 and Company dull and The King's Demons pretty dire, so I was curious to see how Dudley would manage turning this one into print.

It's not too bad, in fact. The beginning is a bit ropey, with Dudley insisting on giving us the exact age of each character, and some dubious descriptions of Sarah's problems in an Ethiopian village; but it settles down and has a lot more oomph than the original. Sarah is explicitly a "girl" (as compared to Elisabeth Sladen's svelte but mature 33 when this was made). She is tough; she sometimes prays; she has a black belt in karate; she loves driving her MGB (and there is a great chase sequence absent from the original TV version).

Some other things done to continuity: Aunt Lavinia has become an anthropologist rather than a virologist, which gives her an excuse for writing to the newspapers about witchcraft; Brendan is explicitly 14, so the reference to him doing three extra O-levels has been dropped. (As indeed O-levels had been by 1987.) The red herrings of the original (Aunt Lavinia's mysterious disappearance, the not-so-sinister Bakers) are retained without further explanation. For some reason K9 sings "While Shepherds Watched" rather than "We Wish You a Merry Christmas" at the end.

So, more towards the Doctor Who - Black Orchid than the Doctor Who - The King's Demons end of the spectrum, and without the silly mistakes that marred the former.

I decided to re-watch the original TV story after reading the book. My memories from two-thirds of my lifetime ago were right: it is indeed not bad but not actively interesting. Ian Sears as Brendan is a particularly weak point - an unispired performance and doesn't change out of school uniform until halfway through (just before he is kidnapped). Worse, he is the first in a line of crap young male sidekicks inflicted on Sarah Jane in the spinoffs. (Jeremy Fitzoliver in the two Third Doctor audios, Josh Townsend in her Big Finish series - though at least the latter turned out to have hidden depths). Well done RTD and colleagues for shifting to the more successful formula of the Sarah Jane Adventures. Of the other cast, veterans Bill Fraser and especially Colin Jeavons are rather delightful. The excellent car chase from the book is a single close encounter with a tractor. Really one for completists only.

Comments

( 4 comments — Leave a comment )
londonkds
May. 31st, 2009 09:02 am (UTC)
some dubious descriptions of Sarah's problems in an Ethiopian village

According to the informative subtitles on the DVD issue, there was a cut line in the original draft of the scriptabout "fighting off fuzzy-wuzzies". Is the novelisation that bad?
nwhyte
May. 31st, 2009 09:27 am (UTC)
Not quite, but it is described as "stinking" and "squalid". Also "North African" which isn't strictly accurate for Ethiopia.
parrot_knight
May. 31st, 2009 09:17 am (UTC)
1987 was the last year of O-Levels, so had the reference been carried over to the novelization it would have been just about to become outdated.

K9 & Company the episode is remarkable for its old-fashionedness in the wake of a season where Doctor Who had been striving, perhaps painfully, to be up-to-date, though there are common elements in both which hearken back to the sort of All Creatures-like family drama which I sometimes think John Nathan-Turner would have been happier making.
swisstone
May. 31st, 2009 11:21 am (UTC)
I find myself thinking how ill-judged K9 and Company was. The intention of teaming K-9 and Sarah was presumably to cover as broad a range of fans as possible. Unfortunately, K-9 fans on the whole were two young to care much about Sarah, and Sarah fans mostly detested K-9. And I'm not sure they they had a clear idea in 1981 what made K9 different from Who, other than the earthbound setting. The genius of RTD was to target different audiences with the spin-offs.
( 4 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

March 2019
S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by yoksel