Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

This is the only Shakespeare play I have yet encountered which deals with the vicissitudes of electoral politics (though really only in a couple of scenes in the second act). Caius Marcius, a Roman general in the early years of the Republic, is given the surname Coriolanus after leading a successful military campaign against the neighbouring Volscii (and capturing the town of Corioli). Back in Rome, he is persuaded by his family to enter politics, but can barely endure the humiliation of asking the common people for their votes. They vote for him anyway, but are easily persuaded not only to change their minds but to exile him from Rome because of his arrogant behaviour.

Coriolanus throws his lot in with his former enemies, the Volsci, and leads them in turn to military success against his home city. He appears implacable in his new allegiance, until his family again appear and persuade him to work for peace instead. He returns to Antium, the Volsci capital, with a peace treaty; the Volsci general Aufidius, unimpressed by this latest shift of allegiance, has him killed on the spot, and the play ends.

Coriolanus is not a very likeable hero, and unlike some of Shakespeare's other problematic heroes, there's not a lot of mystery or suspense about his actions. He is arrogant and proud, and prefers fighting battles to fighting elections. At the same time he is a sucker for the wishes of his wife and mother, who talk him into politics in the first place, and then talk him out of attacking Rome at the end. An inspired director and actor could no doubt make something memorable of it, but it's tough material to work with.

Shakespeare doesn't seem to be a big fan of electoral democracy. The voters are shown as fickle, agreeing with the person who last shouted at them, easily manipulated by Coriolanus' enemies, who have deliberately set him up for failure, humiliation and exile (and then get their just deserts in terms of military disaster and civil chaos). Coriolanus however is not a good man struggling with an evil system; he is a vain man who is easily outmanœuvred by the leaders of the democratc faction.

The most interesting of the other characters are Aufidius, the Volscian general, Menenius, Coriolanus' friend in Rome, and Volumnia, his mother. Arkangel has decently solid performances in all four main parts (Paul Jesson, Martin Marquez, Ewan Hooper, Marjorie Yates). Clive Brill, the director, has had a good idea for the soundscape which doesn't quite work: the Volsci are Yorkshiremen, and the incidental music is therefore all in colliery brass band style. The resonances would have been better if Rome had sounded musically distinct from the Volscian territories; also I think the Westminster/Yorkshire split is a poor parallel for the Roman/Volscian of the story - English/Welsh might have been better. (And the minor characters have accents from all over the place: Aufidius has two very camp servants, one from the Home Counties and the other from Scotland.) He's limited, of course, by the audio format: on the stage you could have a dozen different ways of distinguishing between them visually, and let them talk however they liked.

I shouldn't complain too much. Apart from Troilus and Cressida, the last dozen or so plays have been pretty solid. (Though I understand there are a couple more duds on the list.)

Henry VI, Part I | Henry VI, Part II | Henry VI, Part III | Richard III | Comedy of Errors | Titus Andronicus | Taming of the Shrew | Two Gentlemen of Verona | Love's Labour's Lost | Romeo and Juliet | Richard II | A Midsummer Night's Dream | King John | The Merchant of Venice | Henry IV, Part I | Henry IV, Part II | Henry V | Julius Caesar | Much Ado About Nothing | As You Like It | Merry Wives of Windsor | Hamlet | Twelfth Night | Troilus and Cressida | All's Well That Ends Well | Measure for Measure | Othello | King Lear | Macbeth | Antony and Cleopatra | Coriolanus | Timon of Athens | Pericles | Cymbeline | The Winter's Tale | The Tempest | Henry VIII | The Two Noble Kinsmen | Edward III | Sir Thomas More (fragment)


( 6 comments — Leave a comment )
Apr. 9th, 2009 02:51 pm (UTC)
I think Coriolanus is thought to be a great play for mature Shakespearean language, and so it's particularly disappointing that you didn't get that from the production. It's in my top five at least, maybe my second favourite after Hamlet. They are the only two I've got icons for.

Edited at 2009-04-09 02:51 pm (UTC)
Apr. 9th, 2009 03:00 pm (UTC)
"You common cry of curs!"

Apart from a decent insult or two, yes, I agree with those who find this one of those plays that one might as well forget about, and your criticisms are very valid. I rather wish we'd done one of the others for English Literature O-level, because this one's a dud.

(Its popularity among theatre companies also seems to rate alongside Timon of Athens.)
Apr. 9th, 2009 03:36 pm (UTC)
An inspired director and actor could no doubt make something memorable of it,
I saw Ian McKellen at the at the Herodus Atticus in Athens in the round many years ago. It was brilliant!
Apr. 9th, 2009 06:41 pm (UTC)
Re: An inspired director and actor could no doubt make something memorable of it,
Yes, but he could make the phone directory sound like high drama!
Apr. 9th, 2009 07:54 pm (UTC)
Re: An inspired director and actor could no doubt make something memorable of it,
Agreed, but he started with Shakespeare - a difficult play, I admit, but glorious poetry and ideas.
Apr. 9th, 2009 09:16 pm (UTC)
I saw the production that communicator's icon is from, so I know that a good director and actor combo can do something stunning with this. I have to admit to liking Coriolanus just because he's this great general and scary, scary man ... who is totally a doormat for every other Roman speaking character. If we love characters that we something of ourselves in, the whole 'will do anything to please Mother' might have been why.

My review of production can be found here - http://redfiona99.livejournal.com/395875.html

IMO Volumina and Coriolanus's mentor (I can never remember the character's name) were the most interestng other characters, and I thought Aufidius was a bit lacking as a character.

( 6 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

November 2019


Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by yoksel