We know the age profile of Hugo and Nebula award winners; we know how many works written in each year have won awards; so we can calculate how many awards for works written in each year should go, on average, to the age cohort of those born between 1942 and 1951, if they won awards at the same average rate as authors born in all years, and compare that with the actual numbers of awards won for works written in each year by authors born between 1942 and 1951. The results are startling:

(I should clarify that the years tabulated are the year of publication of the award-winning work, and that I tally each joint win separately - so the joint win by Mr and Mrs Robinson of the 1978 Hugo and 1977 Nebula for "Stardance" counts for four awards in 1977, the year of publication.)
There have been four years when the 1942-51 cohort managed a clean sweep of all Hugos and Nebulas for works published in that year:
1983:
Gardner Dozois (b. 1947) Nebula, Best Short Story, "The Peacemaker"
Octavia E. Butler (b. 1947) Hugo, Best Short Story, "Speech Sounds "
David Brin (b. 1950) Hugo & Nebula, Best Novel, Startide Rising
Greg Bear (b. 1951) Hugo & Nebula, Best Novelette, "Blood Music"; Nebula, Best Novella, "Hardfought"
Timothy Zahn (b. 1951) Hugo, Best Novella, "Cascade Point"
1984
John Varley (b. 1947) Hugo & Nebula, Best Novella, "Press Enter
Octavia E. Butler (b. 1947) Hugo & Nebula, Best Novelette, "Bloodchild"
Gardner Dozois (b. 1947) Nebula, Best Short Story, "Morning Child"
William Gibson (b. 1948) Hugo & Nebula, Best Novel, Neuromancer
David Brin (b. 1950) Hugo, Best Short Story, "The Crystal Spheres"
1988
C.J. Cherryh (b. 1942) Hugo, Best Novel, Cyteen
Michael D. Resnick (b. 1942) Hugo, Best Short Story, "Kirinyaga"
Connie Willis (b. 1945) Hugo & Nebula, Best Novella, "The Last of the Winnebagos"
George Alec Effinger (b. 1947) Hugo & Nebula, Best Novelette, "Schrödinger's Kitten"
James Morrow (b. 1947) Nebula, Best Short Story "Bible Stories for Adults, No. 17: The Deluge"
Lois McMaster Bujold (b. 1949) Nebula, Best Novel Falling Free
1992
Vernor Vinge (b. 1944) joint Hugo, Best Novel, A Fire Upon the Deep
Connie Willis (b. 1945) joint Hugo and Nebula, Best Novel, Doomsday Book; Hugo & Nebula, Best Short Story, "Even the Queen"
Janet Kagan (b. 1945) Hugo, Best Novelette, "The Nutcracker Coup"
James Morrow (b. 1947) Nebula, Best Novella, "City of Truth"
Lucius Shepard (b. 1947) Hugo, Best Novella, "Barnacle Bill the Spacer"
Pamela Sargent (b. 1948) Nebula, Best Novelette, "Danny Goes to Mars"
That's probably not going to happen again. They did not win any awards for works published in 2000, for the first time since 1973. Since then, however, they have won another 13, whereas if they won at the average rate of all authors, they would have garnered only another 6.83.
In summary: authors born between 1942 and 1951 have won almost twice as many Hugos and Nebulas as might be expected, comparing them with all Hugo and Nebula winners.
September 27 2006, 15:38:02 UTC 5 years ago
September 27 2006, 16:11:01 UTC 5 years ago
- look at the age demographic of SFWA members; is that "baby boom" decade a peak?
- when most of these guys started writing (early 60s-early 80s) you had various TV and movie-fuelled booms in SF. So they go from being the Young Turks in the 60s-80s to being the Establishment in the 90s and 00s....
September 27 2006, 15:53:57 UTC 5 years ago
September 27 2006, 16:12:51 UTC 5 years ago
September 27 2006, 17:41:49 UTC 5 years ago
The start, middle, and end are all flexible, but this data seems to point squarely at early baby boomers.
September 29 2006, 08:59:50 UTC 5 years ago
Rather to my surprise, it doesn't come near resolving the issue. The birth peak in the post-war US Baby Boom is actually from 1952 onwards, so does not include the 1942-51 cohort. Indeed, sf writers from the peak Baby Boom years are very notably under-represented among the winners.
Anonymous
October 3 2006, 02:21:53 UTC 5 years ago
The Golden Age of sf is 12
/speculation onHugos aren't voted by writers, they're voted by fans. The baby-boomers probably voted for writers who were new, fresh, and exciting when they were 12. That means writers a little older than they were, say, by 10 years.
/speculation off
Regards,
Jack Tingle
September 28 2006, 07:29:21 UTC 5 years ago
September 29 2006, 08:59:42 UTC 5 years ago
Rather to my surprise, it doesn't come near resolving the issue. The birth peak in the post-war US Baby Boom is actually from 1952 onwards, so does not include the 1942-51 cohort. Indeed, sf writers from the peak Baby Boom years are very notably under-represented among the winners.
September 27 2006, 17:32:16 UTC 5 years ago
I can think of four ways, each of which changes the meaning of the results.
My four possible ways are:
(% of nominees in [1942-1951]) * (number of awards in given year)
(% of eligible authors in [1942-1951]) * (number of awards in given year)
(% of US Workforce in [1942-1951]) * (number of awards in given year)
(% of World Workforce in [1942-1951] * (number of awards in given year)
Do any of those match your method, or am I missing something?
September 27 2006, 18:13:01 UTC 5 years ago
For any given year, there is an age cohort into which the authors born between 1942 and 1951 fall - so for 1983, that age cohort is those between ages 32 and 41.
I already have the data of how many awards have been won by authors of different ages. So I know that 16 have been won by 32-year-olds, 10 by 33-year-olds, and so on up to 15 won by 41-year-olds for a total of 138, 37.5% of all awards to authors aged between 32 and 41 at the time of publication.
8 awards were given to works published in 1983, so the expected number of awards to the 1942-51 cohort is 8 * 0.375 = 3 exactly.
The actual number of awards won by authors in that age range for work published in that year, as noted above, is all eight.
September 28 2006, 01:07:05 UTC 5 years ago
September 28 2006, 09:29:57 UTC 5 years ago
Anonymous
September 28 2006, 14:19:20 UTC 5 years ago
Martin Wisse
September 28 2006, 18:19:09 UTC 5 years ago
September 28 2006, 23:07:53 UTC 5 years ago
September 29 2006, 05:38:43 UTC 5 years ago
Anonymous
October 11 2006, 18:52:21 UTC 5 years ago
Nominations?
Do you see the same trend in nominations or just in winners?Oliver Morton
October 11 2006, 19:54:18 UTC 5 years ago
Re: Nominations?
Loved your Mars book, by the way. I bought it in Vienna airport in 2002, lost it later that trip at Lake Ohrid in Macedonia, and had to get another copy.I haven't tried running the same tests on the nomination lists. It will take a lot longer - not all authors' birthdates are easy to find (it took me years, but I am confident I do now have every Hugo and Nebula winner's birth year), and the number of nominations varied much more widely over time than the number of actual awards made.
Having said which, I would be very surprised if there is much difference bteween the two sets of figures - another factor which discourages me from making the test!