?

Log in

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Second paragraph of third chapter:
This chapter concentrates on the death date, the date after which>/i> Proto-Indo-European must have ceased to exist. But it helps to begin by considering how long a period probably preceded that. Given that the time between the birth and death dates of Proto-Indo-European could not have been infinite, precisely how long a time was it? Do languages, which are living, changing things, have life expectancies?
My attention was drawn to this by a very positive review from none other than Lois McMaster Bujold back in 2009 on her Myspace blog (the review is now lost, alas, due to Myspace deleting it).

It is a very detailed presentation of evidence supporting a theory that I have known about for a long time: that Proto-Indo-European, the long-lost language from which most European languages, most Indian languages and others (notably Farsi) are descended, was originally spoken by tribes living on the steppe between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea, around 3500 BC. There's a well-known set of arguments for this which starts from the vocabulary which can be reconstructed: their language had words for birch, otter, beaver, lynx, bear, horse and bee and honey (these last significant because apparently you don't get bees east of the Urals). The fact that they had a whole vocabulary dealing with wheeled vehicles, and also sheep with wool (woolly sheep only appear after 4000 BC, whether due to mutation, artificial selection or both) also sets an archaeological time horizon.

Anthony turns this linguistic evidence into a sequenced story of technological innovation: the domestication of sheep and cattle, then horses, then the development of agriculture and towns, and then the invention of wagons and war-chariots. This was enough to give the people of the steppes using this technology a decisive edge as they settled the fertile but hiterto unfarmed uplands and valleys of Europe and Southwest Asia. This is supported by a wealth of archaeological evidence from excavations in Russia over the last few decades, several conducted by Anthony himself. (I confess I skimmed the detail of the digs; I worked on two archaology sites in 1984-85, which was enough to scratch my itch for life.)

I've always found the idea of reconstructing a dead language romantic and fascinating, but this book really scores by making firm arguments based on archeaology and documentation (such as the Rig Veda) which all support the conclusion. He also looks at when and where the daughter languages might have plausibly split off to form their own groups, though not in detail. The early history of Germanic languagues is still a bit mysterious. But it's a fascinating book, which left me with admiration for what we can find out, but also awareness of how little we can ever know about the lives of our ancestors thousands of years ago.

Comments

( 5 comments — Leave a comment )
johnny9fingers
Jan. 9th, 2017 09:58 pm (UTC)
Not sure about bees not existing East of the Urals.

They certainly exist and existed in India, where the Rig Veda was probably written, though, like iron, they are not mentioned. However, I have no Sanskrit, so my comment is purely circumstantial and based on necessarily inadequate translations.


Edited at 2017-01-09 10:32 pm (UTC)
del_c
Jan. 10th, 2017 08:30 am (UTC)
I expect they mean something like "East of the Urals and North of the Himalaya" for the purposes of ruling out an alternative to a West of the Urals origin. Nobody proposes an Indian origin for Proto-Indo-European.

I too do not know whether the bee statement is true, and I've seen things "proved" by the syllogism "x is true; if x is true, y is true; therefore y is true", only to find out later that x isn't true. Presumably the book contains the convincing case.
minnesattva
Jan. 10th, 2017 12:00 am (UTC)
This book is on my wishlist, I'd love to read it. :)
minnesattva
Jan. 10th, 2017 12:00 am (UTC)
This book is on my wishlist, I'd love to read it. :)
inulro
Jan. 10th, 2017 08:45 am (UTC)
I think everybody skims the chapter that's about nothing but pottery types. Otherwise, I loved this book (and I completely appreciate that it's included because it's content that isn't otherwise available in a language other than Russian, but I've had preferred an appendix).
( 5 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

July 2017
S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by yoksel