Previous Entry | Next Entry

earthsea
Next up in my reading of the BSFA nominees, and again I like this one more than the one I have already read; In By Light Alone, humanity has become universally able to photosynthesise enough energy to stay alive through their hair by virtue of a drug which is freely available, and has consequently collapsed into a Gatsbyesque dichotomy of the super-wealthy and the poor. The plot concerns a couple who are holidaying in an exotic resort, whose obscenely comfortable world is upended when one of their children is stolen - not kidnapped, no ransom involved; we then follow first their efforts to get her back and then the real story of her return. It's lushly descriptive, but most of the characters are so unpleasant that it's rather difficult to enjoy (and then the missing daughter is almost too heroic when she finally turns up).

Most reviewers have concentrated on Roberts' commentary on wealth and gender, but I took something slightly different from it. By curious coincidence I have been reading this book on a trip to Tbilisi, which is the setting for a couple of scenes and the backdrop for several others. (I teased the author on Twitter about one geographical howler; the author replied that "it's possible the borders have been redrawn a little, in my future-world".) More to the point, Roberts' future world is also a world without conflict, where his characters (both rich and poor) are able to wander across borders that in our world are tense and contentious but in the world of By Light Alone are sunk into a sullen peace, watched over by local militias and strongmen whose desire for a quiet life apparently doesn't include conquering the next village. (Though the book ends with renewed conflict between rich and poor, personified in the family who are his core characters.)

Those of us who take an interest in the origins of conflict occasionally debate the extent to which access to resources is a universal factor (my own take is that it can be over-rated; cultural factors can exacerbate conflict even in areas which are wealthy, or prevent it in areas which are poor). Iain M. Banks portrays a post-scarcity future where conflict is pretty much absent except for those outside the Culture. I was a bit disappointed that the disappearance of traditional conflict from Roberts' world wasn't really a matter of comment within the novel; Tbilisi, Yerevan and Mount Ararat are basically far-off places which are not like New York and are full of poor people, and while that's explicitly the view of the unpleasant rich characters, I felt it was implicitly the view of the novel as a whole, and an opportunity missed.

Comments

( 7 comments — Leave a comment )
mahendra_snark
Feb. 16th, 2012 04:19 pm (UTC)
the absence of traditional conflict was part of the premise: that completely obliterating traditional economies might radically change the MO of human aggression. In the Garden of Eden, where everything is given unto us, we'll still squabble but on a smaller scale. Wherever there's humanity, there's inhumanity, but carefully tailored to match the supply-demand equation of the war machine.
james_nicoll
Feb. 16th, 2012 05:10 pm (UTC)
In By Light Alone, humanity has become universally able to photosynthesise enough energy to stay alive through their hair by virtue of a drug which is freely available,

(hysterical laughter)

drplokta
Feb. 16th, 2012 05:13 pm (UTC)
By comparison with the premises of Roberts' other novels (e.g. gravity suddenly and permanently shifts by 90 degrees one day) it's not too bad at all.
james_nicoll
Feb. 16th, 2012 05:40 pm (UTC)
Were you around for the discussion I had with him on More Words, Deeper Hole about why it is impractical for a space station to gets its air by dangling a hose into the upper atmosphere? Jesus, he makes Ray Bradbury look like Hal Clement.
gareth_rees
Feb. 16th, 2012 05:49 pm (UTC)
By Light Alone is not trying to be hard science fiction (it's a satire) so for me the implausibility of the technological background wasn't the kind of deal-breaker that it was in Gradisil.
peteyoung
Feb. 16th, 2012 08:04 pm (UTC)
I thought he explored the idea sufficiently well in his novelette 'Hair', one the better stories in Geoff Ryman's anthology When It Changed. It sounds like he's added too many more dimensions to the story, perhaps. It's next up on my BSFA Award reading list and I'm curious to see what I make of it.
gummitch
Feb. 17th, 2012 08:24 am (UTC)
I'm curious to see what I make of it

(Going by my previous excperience of Mr Roberts novels...) Could I suggest a hat?
( 7 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by yoksel